Jamie Golombek: Taxpayer on the hook for positive for improperly transferring contributions from one financial institution to a different
Evaluations and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by means of hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
I acquired my 2023 Discover of Evaluation this week and it contained the complete particulars of my tax evaluation, a proof of modifications and different necessary info, together with a one-page detailed registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP) deduction restrict and out there contribution room assertion. What it didn’t comprise, nevertheless, was the same assertion about my out there tax-free financial savings account (TFSA) contribution room.
Commercial 2
Article content material
For this, that you must go surfing to the Canada Income Company’s portal, My Account or cellphone the tax info cellphone service (TIPS) at 1-800-267-6999. Assuming you will have the endurance to carry (wait instances this week had been 1.5 to 2 hours), you may ask an agent for a TFSA Room Assertion and a TFSA Transaction Abstract, which present the knowledge the CRA has acquired out of your TFSA issuers about your contributions and withdrawals.
Article content material
Annually, all TFSA issuers are required to electronically submit a TFSA document to the CRA for every particular person who has a TFSA. Issuers should submit this info by the final day of February of the next yr, and report all TFSA transactions you made on or earlier than Dec. 31 of the prior yr.
It’s necessary, nevertheless, to match the TFSA transaction info the CRA has with your individual information to make sure the knowledge they’ve is appropriate and updated. It’s potential that whenever you look on-line, particularly within the first few months of the yr, the CRA might not but have acquired and processed the earlier yr’s transactions, that means they’re not but mirrored within the TFSA quantities proven on-line. This might result in an overcontribution.
Prime Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
The penalty for overcontributing is the same as one per cent per 30 days for every month you’re over your restrict. In case you get assessed a TFSA penalty tax, you may request the CRA to waive or cancel it, which the company has the ability to do if it may be established the tax arose “as a consequence of an affordable error,” and the overcontribution is withdrawn from the TFSA “immediately.”
If the CRA refuses to cancel the tax, you may take the matter to Federal Court docket, the place a choose will decide whether or not the CRA’s determination to not waive the tax was “cheap.”
The newest determination involving a TFSA overcontribution, determined in April 2024, involved a taxpayer who went about transferring his TFSA from one monetary establishment to a different within the fallacious method.
The taxpayer had not less than two TFSA accounts. Initially of 2020, his unused TFSA room was $6,270. He contributed a complete of $46,000 in 2020, and so he exceeded his restrict by $39,730 and was consequently assessed a penalty tax.
The supply of his overcontributions might be traced again to the taxpayer’s actions in early 2020. On Feb. 4, 2020, he withdrew $20,000 from his Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec TFSA account, and deposited it the subsequent day into his Nationwide Financial institution TFSA account.
Commercial 4
Article content material
He did the identical factor once more the next month, when on March 9, 2020, he withdrew one other $20,000 from his Desjardins TFSA account, solely to deposit it the subsequent day into his Nationwide Financial institution of Canada TFSA. He had additionally deposited one other $6,000 into his TFSA account in early 2020, so his whole 2020 TFSA contributions had been $46,000, however he solely had $6,270 in unused room.
In July 2021, the taxpayer acquired a discover from the CRA advising him that he had exceeded his TFSA contribution restrict in 2020, and telling him he needed to pay $2,166 in penalty tax on his extra contributions for 2020.
In October 2021, the taxpayer despatched a letter to the CRA requesting that it cancel the tax on his extra TFSA contributions. In March 2022, the CRA wrote to him denying his request, saying it may solely accomplish that if the contributions had been made on account of a “cheap error,” and the person instantly took steps to withdraw them from the TFSA, which was not the case right here.
Following this refusal, the taxpayer filed a second utility in April 2022 for the cancellation of the tax. In June 2022, the CRA once more denied his request “as a result of the transfers of funds made in 2020 from one TFSA account to a different TFSA account weren’t ‘direct transfers’ for the reason that transfers weren’t made by the monetary establishment.” The end result was that these transfers had been thought of to be common contributions, placing the taxpayer in an overcontribution state of affairs.
Commercial 5
Article content material
The taxpayer appealed this determination to the Federal Court docket. He argued that “he (had) acted in good religion in transferring funds from one TFSA account to a different.” However the CRA maintained that the taxpayer’s error on this case was not a “cheap error” as a result of he admitted he had not made his transfers within the method prescribed by the CRA (by asking his monetary establishment to take action immediately) since he was unaware of the duty to take action. Within the CRA’s view, its train of discretion to waive the penalty tax wouldn’t be applicable within the circumstances.
The choose reviewed the arguments after which cited varied prior instances coping with related eventualities through which it was held that it was as much as the taxpayer to know the TFSA guidelines, together with property switch funds “immediately” from one TFSA to a different.
It might’t merely be accomplished through a withdrawal and subsequent deposit, however have to be accomplished immediately by the monetary establishment. In all these instances, the courts have persistently held that the CRA’s refusal to deal with such errors as “cheap errors” (which might enable the CRA to waive the tax), was, itself, cheap.
Commercial 6
Article content material
The choose finally expressed sympathy for the taxpayer, however mentioned he was “certain by the jurisprudence and ideas recognized by my colleagues. My function is to not rule on the deserves, however to evaluate whether or not the (CRA’s) determination is cheap, figuring out whether or not it’s intelligible, clear and justified.” The choose concluded that it was, and dismissed the taxpayer’s case.
Advisable from Editorial
Whereas the CRA sought prices, the choose refused to award the company something owing to the unlucky circumstances of the case.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
In case you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.
Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information that you must know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
