Adam Black: The query of which nation’s legal guidelines govern the cut up can have vital penalties
Opinions and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by means of hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
Households at present are more and more cellular, typically pushed by a work-from-anywhere mindset. However when a pair that has ties to multiple nation decides to separate, the query of which nation’s legal guidelines govern the cut up can have vital penalties.
For a partner in Ontario, the jurisdictional controversy arising from separation is especially acute when a divorce is granted exterior of Canada. Merely put, the granting of a overseas divorce will extinguish the power of a separated partner in Ontario to acquire spousal help underneath the legal guidelines of Canada and Ontario.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Article content material
This challenge was just lately earlier than the Courtroom of Attraction for Ontario in two unrelated instances, selections for which have been launched in February.
Within the first case, the couple was married in 2012 in Russia, the place they resided on the time. The couple and their little one moved to Ontario in March 2018 and have resided right here ever since. Simply days after shifting out of the household residence in November 2019, the husband utilized for a divorce in Russia.
Although the spouse objected that the divorce ought to be decided in Ontario, arguing that she wouldn’t be eligible to obtain spousal help from her husband underneath the legal guidelines of Russia, the Russian courtroom granted the divorce in January 2020.
In July of that 12 months, the spouse commenced courtroom proceedings in Ontario looking for spousal help. All through the Ontario courtroom continuing, it was understood that if the Russian divorce order was acknowledged in Canada, the spouse can be unable to pursue spousal help in Ontario.
The spouse argued the husband sought and obtained the Russian divorce for the particular goal of avoiding his obligation to pay spousal help. In different phrases, the husband engaged in forum-shopping, the observe of selecting a courtroom location that can end in a extra beneficial end result.
Prime Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
At trial, Justice Jana Steele of the Ontario Superior Courtroom of Justice agreed with the spouse and located the Russian divorce shouldn’t be acknowledged in Ontario. The choose famous that “the Russian divorce, which was obtained lower than two months after separation, offers (the husband) a back-door with which to flee his authorized duties, and runs counter to the 4 spousal help targets set out in s. 15.2(6) of the Divorce Act.”
The husband appealed. In a ruling launched Feb. 28, Justice Jonathon George of the Courtroom of Attraction for Ontario additionally agreed with the spouse and dismissed the husband’s enchantment. In response to the choose, whereas “forum-shopping is not going to all the time violate our ideas of morality, ‘unfair forum-shopping ways’ most actually will.”
In reaching his conclusion, Justice George pointed to the sturdy emphasis positioned on the values of partnership and equality in Canadian household regulation. It’s these values which underpin a partner’s entitlement to spousal help in Ontario.
Finally, the Russian divorce order was not acknowledged in Ontario and the spouse was capable of pursue spousal help.
Commercial 4
Article content material
The second case earlier than the Courtroom of Attraction reached the alternative end result.
In that case, the couple was married in 1998 in Bangladesh, the place they resided with their three kids for a lot of the marriage. In 2015, the husband and kids obtained landed immigrant standing and moved to Canada the next 12 months. The spouse remained in Bangladesh.
Though the husband had sponsored the spouse for Canadian everlasting resident standing, he later gave her written discover of his intention to divorce her pursuant to the legal guidelines of Bangladesh. The spouse moved to Canada in February 2017, one month earlier than the Bangladeshi divorce turned efficient.
Three years later, the spouse commenced courtroom proceedings in Ontario whereby she sought a divorce and different reduction, together with that the husband pay spousal help.
The central challenge within the Ontario courtroom proceedings, once more, was the popularity of the overseas divorce. Whereas the spouse mentioned the Bangladeshi divorce shouldn’t be acknowledged in Ontario, the truth that she had remarried in reliance on the Bangladeshi divorce weighed in favour of recognizing the overseas divorce in Ontario. Within the outcome, the Bangladeshi divorce was acknowledged in Ontario.
Commercial 5
Article content material
Writing for the Courtroom of Attraction for Ontario, Justice Julie Thorburn famous that the spousal help provisions in Ontario’s Household Legislation Act don’t “embody the phrase ‘former partner’ when describing who might apply for help.” The choose continues: “Ontario instances have subsequently interpreted the Household Legislation Act as not allowing a former partner, equivalent to (the spouse), to hunt spousal help.”
Justice Thorburn famous that “until and till the wording within the Household Legislation Act is modified to outline ‘partner’ to explicitly embody a former partner, or this line of instances is revisited, a celebration equivalent to (the spouse), to a overseas divorce, can not search spousal help underneath the Household Legislation Act.”
The choose concluded her evaluation by acknowledging that the laws, in its present kind, “might end in vital hardship” for individuals who could also be entitled to spousal help in Ontario however for a divorce having been granted exterior of Canada. Justice Thorburn identified that laws in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island ensures a declare for spousal help will survive a overseas divorce.
Commercial 6
Article content material
For Justice Thorburn, the treatment is easy: “Addition of the phrases ‘or former partner’ to s. 30 of the Household Legislation Act to make sure that spouses who divorce in overseas jurisdictions can convey functions for help in Ontario is a matter that, in my opinion, may very well be addressed by the Ontario legislature.”
Really helpful from Editorial
For Ontario {couples} with connections to exterior nations, the instances are a reminder to fastidiously perceive their rights, entitlements and obligations, each earlier than deciding to relocate and when separating or looking for a divorce.
Adam N. Black is a accomplice within the household regulation group at Torkin Manes LLP in Toronto.
Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you have to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
